Comparison — 2026

SignalDeck vs TradesViz

The closest analytical competitor in the market. Both have rule-based backtesting. The gap is Walk-Forward Analysis, Monte Carlo, and R-value as a framework — versus TradesViz's 70+ indicators, 30,000+ tickers, and AI Q&A. Depth vs breadth.

SignalDeck: Free (Beta) TradesViz: $15–$30/mo

Choose SignalDeck if...

  • Walk-Forward Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation matter to you
  • R-Multiple is your core risk framework — not just one metric
  • You want SQN scoring, Kelly Criterion, and a structured 5-step Post Mortem
  • You trade MT4/MT5 and want real-time live balance sync for accurate position sizing
  • You trade on IBKR, cTrader, Robinhood, Schwab, Fidelity, E*TRADE, or Coinbase
  • You want full-feature free access during beta

Choose TradesViz if...

  • You need 70+ indicators for custom strategy testing
  • You want AI Q&A to query your trade data conversationally
  • You need 30,000+ ticker universe for multi-symbol testing
  • You need import from legacy or niche brokers beyond SignalDeck's current coverage

The only trading journal with Walk-Forward Analysis, Monte Carlo, and grid-search optimization.

Feature Comparison

Feature SignalDeck TradesViz
🔔 Alerts & Monitoring
Live alerts on open positions ✅ Price + break-even ⚠️ Screener only
⚡ Strategy Backtester
Automated Rule-Based Backtester ✅ 16 Built-In Strategies ✅ 70+ Indicators
Walk-Forward Analysis ✅ Only journal with this
Monte Carlo Simulation ✅ 1,000 paths
Parameter Optimization ✅ Grid Search (500 combos)
Backtest ↔ Journal Overlay ✅ Strategy Link
Indicator Library ✅ 16 built-in strategies ✅ 70+ indicators
Ticker Universe ⚠️ Focused ✅ 30,000+
SPY/QQQ Benchmark Overlay ⚠️ Same-symbol only
R-Value Analytics
R-Value Native Framework ✅ Core Design
SQN Score
Kelly Criterion Sizing
Structured Post Mortem (5-step)
Platform
AI Q&A on Trade Data
MT4/MT5 Import + Live Balance Sync ✅ Real-time equity ⚠️ Import only, no balance sync
IBKR Import ✅ Flex Web Service
cTrader Import ✅ OAuth
US Equities & Crypto (Robinhood, Schwab, Fidelity, Coinbase) ✅ via SnapTrade
⚡ Futures Trading (ES/NQ/CL/GC) — New v1.0.59
Native Futures (ES/NQ/CL/GC) ✅ Tick Math + Globex ⚠️ Via broker import (P&L from broker data)
Tick-Aligned P&L Math ✅ Auto Contract Spec
CME Globex Session Monitoring ✅ DST-Aware
Broad Broker Auto-Import ✅ Multiple platforms
Free Tier ✅ Full features in beta ⚠️ Limited free tier
Monthly Price Free (Beta) $15–$30

View full comparison with all 6 competitors

Both have backtesting. Only one checks for overfitting.

A backtest that runs on 70 indicators but has no overfitting check is measuring your ability to curve-fit historical data. Walk-Forward Analysis is the only way to know if the edge is real before you risk capital on it.

TradesViz Backtester

70+ indicators

Broad indicator library. No Walk-Forward Analysis. No Monte Carlo. No way to detect overfitting.

Most Other Journals

No Backtester

Edgewonk, Tradervue, TradeZella have no automated rule-based backtester at all.

SignalDeck

Full Workflow

Backtest → Walk-Forward → Monte Carlo → Grid Search → Journal Overlay. Out-of-sample validation included.

Futures Trading — New v1.0.59

SignalDeck vs TradesViz: Futures Support

TradesViz supports futures through broker imports and has a broad indicator library for analysis once data is in. If your broker sends correct futures fill data, TradesViz can surface it. But TradesViz has no native tick-based P&L engine — the calculation accuracy is entirely broker-dependent. There is no contract-spec fetching (no automatic knowledge that ES is 50 × $0.25/tick = $12.50/tick), no CME Globex session gating for alert evaluation, and no front-month contract search. SignalDeck computes futures P&L from first principles, validates tick alignment on every price, and gates alert evaluation to Globex hours — whether you import from a broker or log manually.

ES · $12.50/tick NQ · $5.00/tick Auto Contract Spec Globex Session Gate Front-Month Search
Full Futures page →
SignalDeck · ESU6 long
Tick move 58 ticks
× $12.50 × 2 contracts +$1,450
R-Multiple +2.9R
Note

TradesViz has a steep learning curve. Its 70+ indicator library and dense analytics interface take significant time to configure correctly. New users commonly report needing several sessions before they get reliable value from the platform. SignalDeck's onboarding is handled through direct Discord access to the founder — setup questions get answered the same day, and the platform's core framework (R-Multiple, SQN, Kelly) is designed to be immediately usable.

Compare onboarding and support quality across all 6 trading journals

Frequently Asked Questions

Does TradesViz support futures trading?

TradesViz supports futures through broker imports and can display imported P&L and trade data. It does not have native tick-aligned P&L math — the accuracy depends on what the broker delivers. It also has no CME Globex session monitoring or front-month contract search. SignalDeck fetches the contract spec automatically for ES, NQ, CL, and GC and computes P&L natively from tick data, regardless of whether you have a broker import. See the SignalDeck Futures page.

Does SignalDeck or TradesViz have better backtesting?

Both have rule-based backtesting. SignalDeck adds Walk-Forward Analysis, 1,000-path Monte Carlo simulation, grid-search parameter optimization (500 combos), and backtest-to-journal equity overlay — none of which TradesViz offers. TradesViz has 70+ indicators and 30,000+ tickers. The trade-off is depth vs breadth: SignalDeck's workflow detects overfitting before you trade; TradesViz lets you test more strategies on more symbols.

Does TradesViz have Walk-Forward Analysis?

No. TradesViz has a rule-based backtester with 70+ indicators but no Walk-Forward Analysis and no Monte Carlo simulation. SignalDeck is the only trading journal with Walk-Forward Analysis built in. Without it, you can't tell if a backtest result is genuine edge or parameter overfitting to historical noise.

Does TradesViz have R-Multiple tracking?

TradesViz does not have R-Multiple as an organizing principle. It has P&L analytics and a same-symbol buy-and-hold comparison, but not an R-value framework. SignalDeck is built around R-Multiple as its core — every metric (expectancy, SQN, Kelly Criterion, equity curves, Post Mortem) flows from risk-normalized R-value.

Does SignalDeck or TradesViz have better broker import?

SignalDeck now supports MT4/MT5 (real-time live balance sync via MetaApi), IBKR via Flex Web Service, cTrader via OAuth, SnapTrade for US retail and crypto brokers (Robinhood, Webull, Schwab, Fidelity, E*TRADE, Coinbase), and CSV in 8 formats. TradesViz has broader coverage across legacy and niche platforms. The live balance sync for MT4/MT5 remains exclusive to SignalDeck.

Which is cheaper — SignalDeck or TradesViz?

Both have free access. SignalDeck is free during beta with all features fully unlocked — Walk-Forward Analysis, Monte Carlo, full backtester. TradesViz has a limited free tier. SignalDeck's paid plans launch June 2026 with Pro starting at $30/month vs TradesViz at $15–$30/month. Existing beta testers were grandfathered.

Is TradesViz hard to learn?

TradesViz is feature-dense with 70+ indicators and multiple analytics views that take time to configure. New users commonly report needing several sessions before getting reliable value. SignalDeck is organized around a smaller set of high-signal analytics. Onboarding is done through Discord — direct access to the founder means setup questions get answered same-day.

Further Reading